The Supreme Court ruled that the keys to decode encrypted messages don’t fall under the private correspondence protections of the Russian constitution. The lawyer of the "Agora" International Human Rights Group who representing the interests of Telegram in court Ramil Akhmetgaliyev during the court session.
The Supreme Court ruled that the keys to decode encrypted messages don’t fall under the private correspondence protections of the Russian constitution. The lawyer of the "Agora" International Human Rights Group who representing the interests of Telegram in court Ramil Akhmetgaliyev during the court session.
[English translation in progress (1)]
The Supreme Court ruled that the keys to decode encrypted messages don’t fall under the private correspondence protections of the Russian constitution. The lawyer of the "Agora" International Human Rights Group who representing the interests of Telegram in court Ramil Akhmetgaliyev during the court session.
The Supreme Court ruled that the keys to decode encrypted messages don’t fall under the private correspondence protections of the Russian constitution. The lawyer of the "Agora" International Human Rights Group who representing the interests of Telegram in court Ramil Akhmetgaliyev during the court session.
The Supreme Court ruled that the keys to decode encrypted messages don’t fall under the private correspondence protections of the Russian constitution. The lawyer of the "Agora" International Human Rights Group who representing the interests of Telegram in court Ramil Akhmetgaliyev during the court session.